A class-action lawsuit accuses Apple of selling watch bands containing harmful PFAS chemicals.
Apple has been sued for allegedly selling wristbands for its smartwatches that contain high levels of 'forever chemicals' known as PFAS that may be linked to harmful health effects in humans. The lawsuit, filed yesterday in the Northern District of California, specifically targets three Apple Watch bands: The Sport Band that comes stock with new basic model Apple Watches, the Ocean Band, and the Nike Sport Band that ships with Nike-branded Apple Watches.
Apple describes all three as being made from fluoroelastomer, which the lawsuit alleges conceals the presence of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. For those unfamiliar with PFAS chemicals, they are widely used in consumer products such as clothing, cleaners, nonstick cookware, and hygiene products, and are valued for being both inexpensive and highly effective. However, PFAS have been linked to serious health concerns, including increased risk of cancer, immune system suppression, and possible harms to unborn children in the womb. They are known as 'forever chemicals' because they break down very slowly and can persist in the environment for decades. Some PFAS compounds are also bioaccumulative, meaning they can build up in the body over time. In short, they're considered very risky substances. Wearing them next to the skin for prolonged periods - like on a watch band – creates many more chances for your body to absorb them.The lawsuit, a proposed class action that includes anyone who has purchased an Apple Watch with one of the offending fluoroelastomer bands, draws on a study conducted by scientists from the University of Notre Dame. Published in December, their work found elevated PFAS levels in a number of fitness trackers and smartwatch bands, including some manufactured by Apple, Fitbit, Google, and Samsung. Twenty-two different bands were tested using particle-induced gamma-ray emission ion beam analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to detect fluorine content – an indicator PFAS is present. According to the study, fluoroelastomers were a frequent material used in the manufacture of the bands tested because of their resistance to sweat, skin oils, and lotion. One particular type of PFAS, perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), was found in the bands at high levels. 'The most remarkable thing we found in this study was the very high concentrations of just one PFAS — there were some samples above 1,000 parts per billion of PFHxA, which is much higher than most PFAS we have seen in consumer products,' Notre Dame professor emeritus and study co-author Graham Peaslee Three of the bands tested fell into the 'expensive' category, and all were found to have significantly elevated levels of fluorine. The study doesn’t specify which bands were tested, but mentions Apple and Apple/Nike product. It is unclear, however, if all three bands mentioned in the lawsuit were considered in the study. We contacted lawyers for the plaintiffs, and the Notre Dame scientists behind the work, to verify that the Apple Watch bands included in the lawsuit were part of the study, and were found to have elevated PFAS levels. We’ve not received a response at the time of publication.The lawsuit argues that Apple should know better than to sell watch bands that may contain potentially harmful PFAS. 'Defendant knows that certain of its products contain PFAS. It also knows that those chemicals are dangerous,' the suit alleges, pointing to a 2022 internal Apple document stating the company is 'committed to phasing out PFAS from our products and packaging.' 'That … promise does not inform consumers which products contain the harmful chemicals,' the suit continued. 'Instead, in respect of watches, continues to hide the existence of PFAS at the point of purchase and otherwise. ' could have avoided the unreasonable safety and environmental hazard with available manufacturing alternatives, and its failure to do so while continuing to promise consumers health, wellness, and sustainability is unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent under consumer protection laws,' the suit asserts. The plaintiffs further allege that Apple's actions violate California's unfair competition, advertising, and consumer legal remedy laws. They also accuse the tech giant of fraud, fraudulent inducement, concealment, misrepresentation, negligence, and unjust enrichment. The suit seeks class certification, an injunction to halt the sale of the alleged offending watch bands, and monetary penalties.
APPLE LAWSUIT FOREVER CHEMICALS PFAS APPLE WATCH BANDS CONSUMER SAFETY HEALTH CONCERNS
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Digital Rights Groups Accuse Apple of Failing to Comply with EU's DMA Interoperability RulesDigital rights advocacy organizations are alleging that Apple is not fulfilling its interoperability obligations under the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA). They argue that Apple's practices related to iOS connectivity features like AirDrop and its handling of developer requests for interoperability are deficient and hinder competition. The groups are calling on the European Commission to take action against Apple, including prohibiting the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) at Apple's discretion, implementing a standardized interoperability request form, and mandating improvements to Apple's bug reporting system.
Read more »
Datacus extractus: Harry Potter publisher breached without resorting to magicPLUS: Allstate sued for allegedly tracking drivers; Dutch DDoS; More fake jobs from Pyongyang; and more
Read more »
LinkedIn Sued Over Alleged Use of Premium InMail Messages for AI TrainingA lawsuit filed against LinkedIn alleges that the company shared Premium customers' private InMail messages with third parties for training AI models. The lawsuit claims this violates LinkedIn's contractual promises and exposes sensitive personal information. While LinkedIn acknowledges using user data for AI training, it denies accessing InMail contents.
Read more »
Conor McGregor Sued Over Alleged Sexual Assault at Miami Heat GameUFC fighter Conor McGregor and the Miami Heat are facing a lawsuit alleging sexual assault at a bathroom at the Kaseya Center during a game in June 2023. A woman, identified as 'Jane Doe,' claims McGregor's security separated her from her friend and then led her into a VIP men's bathroom where he allegedly assaulted her. McGregor maintains his innocence and his attorney claims the lawsuit is baseless.
Read more »
Conor McGregor and Miami Heat Sued for Sexual AssaultUFC fighter Conor McGregor and the Miami Heat are facing a federal lawsuit alleging sexual assault. The plaintiff, identified as 'Jane Doe,' claims McGregor assaulted her in a bathroom at the Kaseya Center after Game 4 of the 2023 NBA Finals. McGregor's attorney denies the allegations, stating the case will be dismissed.
Read more »
Musk sued over buying Twitter shares at artificially low prices by US finance regulatorMr Musk's lawyer says his client 'has done nothing wrong and everyone sees this sham for what it is'.
Read more »