Democratic Minnesota state senator invokes 5th Amendment rights at ethics hearing over burglary charge

United Kingdom News News

Democratic Minnesota state senator invokes 5th Amendment rights at ethics hearing over burglary charge
United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines
  • 📰 FoxNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 87%

Democratic Minnesota state Sen. Nicole Mitchell faced an ethics panel on Tuesday regarding her arrest on first-degree burglary charges.

Democratic Minnesota state Sen. Nicole Mitchell refused to testify Tuesday during an ethics panel regarding the burglary charge she faces for allegedly breaking into her stepmother’s home last month. Mitchell invoked her Fifth Amendment rights and did not speak during her appearance in front of the panel, which is made up of two Democrats and two Republicans. The panel, however, remained divided on a potential path forward regarding Mitchell’s future in the legislature following the charges.

According to a criminal complaint, Mitchell acknowledged that she entered through a window and told investigators she was trying to get her late father's ashes, photos, a flannel shirt and other items of sentimental value, claiming her stepmother had stopped speaking to her after her father’s death and refused to give her the items. One of Mitchell's attorneys, Bruce Ringstrom Jr.

Mitchell, of Woodbury, has represented District 47 since she was elected to the state Senate in 2022. She was previously a meteorologist for KSTP-TV and Minnesota Public Radio and serves as a lieutenant colonel in the Air National Guard. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

FoxNews /  🏆 9. in US

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Minnesota lawmakers debate constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota lawmakers debate constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsLawmakers in Minnesota have launched a debate on legislation to amend the constitution to protect LGBTQ rights and abortion; more than 100 people filled the legislative hearing room.
Read more »

Minnesota legislators consider constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota legislators consider constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats have introduced far-reaching legislation that would add abortion and LGBTQ rights to the state’s constitution.
Read more »

Minnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats have introduced far-reaching legislation that would add abortion and LGBTQ rights to the state’s constitution.
Read more »

Minnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats have introduced far-reaching legislation that would add abortion and LGBTQ rights to the state’s constitution.
Read more »

Minnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats have introduced far-reaching legislation that would add abortion and LGBTQ rights to the state’s constitution
Read more »

Minnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats propose constitutional amendment to protect abortion and LGBTQ rightsMinnesota Democrats have introduced far-reaching legislation that would add abortion and LGBTQ rights to the state’s constitution. If approved by lawmakers this session and then voters on the 2026 ballot, it would be much harder for future lawmakers to repeal those rights in the future.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-04-08 10:41:40