The Supreme Court is hearing arguments Wednesday in a case that could determine whether doctors can provide abortions to pregnant women with medical emergencies.
The Supreme Court will consider Wednesday when doctors can provide abortions during medical emergencies in states with bans enacted after the high court’s sweeping decision overturning Roe v. Wade.is hearing oral arguments in a case that could determine whether doctors can provide abortions to pregnant women with medical emergencies in states that enact abortion bans.
“That could never lead to pregnancy termination because that is not the accepted standard of practice to treat any mental health emergency,” Prelogar said.Justice Samuel Alito asked if EMTALA applies just to situations where someone’s health could be permanently impaired, or if it also applies when a patient’s health might be temporarily impaired.
She is arguing her fourth abortion case in her 2 ½ years on the job. The others include the case in which a conservative majorityThe term, “medical standard of care” refers to the treatment that is widely used by health care professionals and accepted by medical experts as the best practice for any specific health condition. Medical standards of care evolve over time as medical therapies improve.
Turner says the law made clear there is no medical certainty requirement — it’s up to the physician to use their subjective “good faith medical judgment” that the abortion is a life-saving procedure. Other friends of the court briefs have come from the Foundation for Moral Law, which contends the federal government is trying to circumvent Idaho law by allowing emergency room abortions. The group argues that the law makes it harder to recruit workers and hinders the participation of women in the workforce.Some groups are hoping to restore abortion access in Idaho regardless of the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Idaho’s law allows abortion only if the life, not the health, of the mother is at risk. But the state’s attorney general has argued that its abortion ban is “consistent” with federal law, which calls for emergency rooms to protect an unborn child in medical emergencies.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court hears case involving Idaho abortion ban and federal law for emergency care todayThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a case that pits Idaho's near-total abortion ban against a federal law that the Biden administration says requires hospitals to offer emergency abortion care in certain situations.
Read more »
What's at stake as the Supreme Court hears Idaho case about abortion in emergenciesThe Supreme Court will consider the question: Should doctors treating pregnancy complications follow state or federal law if the laws conflict? Here's how the case could affect women and doctors.
Read more »
What's at stake as the Supreme Court hears Idaho case about abortion in emergenciesThe Supreme Court will consider the question: Should doctors treating pregnancy complications follow state or federal law if the laws conflict? Here's how the case could affect women and doctors.
Read more »
Supreme Court to weigh scope of Idaho abortion ban in first post-Roe testThe justices will decide whether federal law protects emergency room abortions.
Read more »
Supreme Court to consider clash of Idaho abortion ban with federal law for emergency careThe Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a case about whether Idaho's near-total ban on abortion is preempted by Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA.
Read more »
Transgenderism: Supreme Court OK’s Idaho’s Child-Protection LawSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »