The conviction of Lucy Letby, a nurse found guilty of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more, is facing potential challenges after medical experts deemed the evidence used against her 'unsafe'. Letby's legal team has applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) for a retrial, raising questions about the strength of the prosecution's case. However, renowned lawyer Joseph Kotrie-Monson argues that Letby's conviction is based on more than just medical evidence, citing her 'ghoulish' behavior, diary entries, and stolen medical documents as compelling circumstantial evidence.
LUCY Letby’s conviction risks being thrown wide open after medical experts deemed evidence used to convict her “unsafe”.- whose academic paper was used to support the evidence against her in court - is also among those pushing for a retrial.
Mr Kotrie-Monson said the lack of medical evidence to convict Letby is not necessarily unusual and does not indicate a miscarriage of justice. He referred to the materials obtained from her home, including her diary being marked with victims’ initials - on, for example, their dates of death and when conditions worsened.The lawyer also spoke about the medical documents she stole and kept under the bed, as well as bizarre notes claiming she was “evil” and guilty.He admitted Letby’s odd behaviour and the circumstantial evidence, detailed to the jury during her trial, is not necessarily enough individually to convict her.
He continued: “That isn't how criminal law works. One doesn't even need to prove the exact mechanism of death in order to prove murder. Asked why so many people are convinced Letby is innocent, Mr Kotrie-Monson said: “At a very basic level, there are many, many people in the public for whom the idea of this apparently nice girl next door nurse could be your mum's friend's daughter could have committed such atrocious crimes.
It didn't take long to get Letby's details - officers had raided a home that linked to the nurse and her Facebook had her work details. Letby also revealed she was undergoing "extra training" to enhance her "knowledge and skills within the Intensive Care area".But as we later found out, the killer hid under this "cover of trust" to "gaslight" everyone around her, including her own colleagues.
They are among a growing number of researchers and politicians calling for Letby's convictions to be quashed due to a miscarriage of justice - much to the dismay of her victims' families. The jury certainly didn't forget Letby's confession when they made their decision. Neither did a second jury at her retrial for attempting kill another baby.
A jury made their decision, Letby was not simply in the wrong place at the wrong time, she was a killer.Baby death expert Dr Dewi Evans - whose evidence in court helped nail Letby - previously The Sun there is simply no doubt in his mind she is guilty., Dr Evans told how he has been under a constant barrage of threats since Letby's trial from her supporters.
Tests later revealed the baby had congenital hyperinsulinism – a condition where the body naturally produces too much insulin. It was this married doctor who became her "best friend" while she was murdering babies that caused the only sign of emotion in the calculating nurse. Some of the other babies were killed or harmed when air or milk was injected into their bloodstream or via a tube in their stomachs.LUCY Letby's horrific murder spree has gained her the grisly moniker of one of Britain's most prolific female serial killersAlong with husband Fred West, Rose abducted, tortured and raped her victims before burying them at their house of horrors in Gloucester.
She also photographed a thank you card from the parents of two of her alleged victims as "something to remember".She said it was a "normal pattern of behaviour" for her to look for the parents of babies she had treated more than once on Facebook. "Having searched for a cause, which they were unable to find, the consultants noticed that the inexplicable collapses and deaths did have one common denominator.Victoria Whitfield believes the nurse also attempted to hurt her premature baby in November 2013.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Fresh Doubts Raised Over Lucy Letby Conviction as Police Notes Suggest Jury MisledDocuments reveal discrepancies in evidence presented at Lucy Letby's trial, raising questions about her conviction for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill seven more. Police notes show that the chief prosecution witness, Dr Dewi Evans, initially found Letby absent during more than a third of the suspicious incidents at the hospital, information not shared with the jury. Additionally, Dr Lee, a neonatologist whose work was cited by the prosecution, will publicly state that his research was misrepresented in court and that none of the babies should have been diagnosed with air embolism.
Read more »
Police Notes Cast Doubt on Lucy Letby Conviction as Expert to Expose 'Misrepresented' EvidenceNew police documents and a statement from a key prosecution expert raise serious questions about the conviction of nurse Lucy Letby. Evidence suggests the jury may have been misled, prompting calls for a retrial.
Read more »
Fresh doubts are raised over conviction of 'killer' nurse Lucy Letby - as unearthed papers show she...'You have no remorse': 'Disgraced' nurse Lucy Letby sentenced to life in prison. Child serial killer nurse Lucy Letby has been sentenced to another whole-life order for the attempted murder of a baby girl.
Read more »
Neonatal Doctor Claims Lucy Letby Conviction Based on Misrepresented ResearchA key piece of evidence against Lucy Letby, a neonatal nurse convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others, is now being challenged by the doctor whose research was used to support the prosecution's case. Dr. Shoo Lee's 1989 study, which found that skin discolourations can occur due to air bubbles in blood vessels, was cited by prosecution expert Dr. Dewi Evans to argue that Letby injected air into the babies. Dr. Lee, now retired, claims his research was misrepresented and that none of the babies should have been diagnosed with air embolism. He is leading an independent review by a panel of international medical experts and is expected to announce their findings, which contradict the original verdict, at a press conference in the UK.
Read more »
Lucy Letby conviction 'major injustice' as expert panel 'didn't find murders'A medical examination of evidence on attacks against babies at the Countess of Chester has been discussed at a press conference
Read more »
New Evidence Casts Doubt on Lucy Letby's ConvictionSir David Davis discusses new expert analysis of Lucy Letby's case, suggesting deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital may have been due to natural causes and suboptimal care, rather than murder. He highlights the lack of this evidence during Letby's trials and calls for a review of the British justice system and the NHS.
Read more »