The Online Safety Bill returns to parliament this week and is set to include a new criminal offence of coercive or controlling behaviour.
The Online Safety Bill returns to parliament this week and is set to include a new criminal offence of coercive or controlling behaviour, as well as strengthening laws shielding children from online dangers, writes Anna Bartter.
In addition, using social media for controlling or coercive behaviour is set to become a criminal offence, after being added to the list of priority offences in the bill.Put simply, the Online Safety Bill, which the government hopes to pass into UK law next summer, is designed to regulate parts of the internet.
This has now been removed, something campaigners argue dangerously waters down the bill. Julie Bentley, chief executive of, described dropping the requirement to remove legal but harmful content as “a hugely backward step”, but culture secretary Michelle Donelan insists “a strengthened Online Safety Bill […] will allow parents to see and act on the dangers sites pose to young people”.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Government denies weakening Online Safety BillNew law will not require removal of 'legal but harmful' content, which critics said risked free speech.
Read more »
i morning briefing: Can the Online Safety Bill really protect children?📨 i morning briefing: Can the Online Safety Bill really protect children? 📬 Sign up to our Early Edition newsletter here ⬇️
Read more »
Why changes to the Government's Online Safety Bill are controversialMeasures which would have forced big technology platforms to remove “legal but harmful” material have been axed from the Online Safety Bill ⬇️ emsferg explains
Read more »
Why the Online Safety Bill is proving so controversialWe look at the rocky path the legislation to protect people online has taken - and where it will go next.
Read more »
Online Safety Bill might not be too little, but it is certainly too lateIs Michelle Donelan's revision of the bill, which removes rules concerning 'legal but harmful' content, in fact an improvement on 'eye-watering potency' or does it leave individuals with no protection?
Read more »