Oracle has asked the US Patent and Trademark Office to partially dismiss a challenge to its JavaScript trademark, filed by Deno Land, a company backed by the JavaScript community. The challenge aims to protect the use of 'JavaScript' in conferences and business ventures. Oracle argues that it uses the term in connection with its products and services, and that relevant consumers do not perceive it as generic.
Oracle this week asked the US Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ) to partially dismiss a challenge to its JavaScript trademark. The move has been criticized as an attempt to either stall or water down legal action against the database giant over the programming language's name.
The challenge, filed by Deno Land, a company backed by more than 16,000 members of the JavaScript community, aims to remove the fear of an Oracle lawsuit for using the term 'JavaScript' in a conference title or business venture. 'Programmers working with JavaScript have formed innumerable community organizations,' the website explains. 'These organizations, like the standards bodies, have been forced to painstakingly avoid naming the programming language they are built around – for example, sadly, without risking a legal trademark challenge against Oracle, there can be no 'JavaScript Conference' nor a 'JavaScript Specification.' The world’s most popular programming language cannot even have a conference in its name.' Oracle is not shy about protecting its trademarks, in part because failure to police a mark weakens it under the law. The tech giant for example won a preliminary injunction against a company using the term 'JavaScript' in its product name, a claim that was subsequently dropped. And in November, the database biz Only 1 in 10 Oracle Java users want to stay with Big Red, Deno Land makes three arguments to invalidate Oracle's ownership of 'JavaScript.' The biz claims that JavaScript has become a generic term; that Oracle committed fraud in 2019 when it applied to renew its trademark; and that Oracle has abandoned its trademark because it does not offer JavaScript products or services. On Monday, Oracle focuses on the dismissal of the fraud claim, while arguing that it expects to prevail on the other two claims, citing corporate use of the trademarked term 'in connection with a variety of offerings, including its JavaScript Extension Toolkit as well as developer’s guides and educational resources, and also that relevant consumers do not perceive JavaScript as a generic term.' The fraud claim follows from Deno Land's assertion that the material Oracle submitted in support of its trademark renewal application has nothing to do with any Oracle product. 'Oracle, through its attorney, submitted specimens showing screen captures of the Node.js website, a project created by Ryan Dahl, Petitioner’s Chief Executive Officer,' the trademark cancellation petition says. 'Node.js is not affiliated with Oracle, and the use of screen captures of the 'nodejs.org' website as a specimen did not show any use of the mark by Oracle or on behalf of Oracle.' Oracle contends that in fact it submitted two specimens to the USPTO – a screenshot from the Node.js website and another from its own 'Where, as here, Registrant 'provided the USPTO with ' at least one of which shows use of the mark in commerce, Petitioner cannot plausibly allege that the inclusion of a second, purportedly defective specimen, was material,' Oracle's motion argues, adding that no evidence of fraudulent intent has been presented. Beyond asking the court to toss the fraud claim, Oracle has requested an additional thirty days to respond to the other two claims. 'Oracle is sidestepping whether their use of the Node.js screenshot was wrong, instead arguing that it simply doesn't matter because they also submitted another document,' he wrote. 'Oracle waited until the deadline to file this motion, a tactic commonly used to drag out proceedings. By challenging only the fraud claim, they avoid addressing genericness and abandonment—the core issues of the case.' Dahl says Oracle's attempt to delay the proceedings forces Deno Land to either drop the fraud claim,'letting them get away with misrepresenting their trademark renewal,' or'spend months fighting this procedural issue before even getting to the real debate.' He concludes,'The truth is simple: Oracle did not create JavaScript. Oracle does not control JavaScript. Oracle should not own the trademark for JavaScript.
JAVASCRIPT TRADEMARK ORACLE DENOLAND USPTO
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Oracle Patches Critical Vulnerabilities in Multiple ProductsOracle has released a comprehensive set of security patches addressing critical vulnerabilities in its wide range of products, including Agile PLM Framework, Oracle Communications, Oracle Analytics, Oracle Hospitality Applications, JD Edwards, MySQL, and PeopleSoft.
Read more »
Marcia Cross Spotted in Los Angeles Rocking Her Trademark Red HairMarcia Cross, known for her role in Desperate Housewives, was seen in Los Angeles displaying her signature red hair. The article details her casual outfit, recent fashion show appearances, and the 20th anniversary celebration of Desperate Housewives.
Read more »
Wagatha Christie t-shirt designer forced to give up trademark fightTammie Ford McMillan had planned to use her alternative on the back of T-shirts which would be personalised on the front with the owner’s name but has had to ditch her fight over costs.
Read more »
Businesswoman Drops 'Wagatha Christie' Trademark Plans After Legal ThreatsTammie Ford McMillan has abandoned her bid to trademark a mirror-image version of 'Wagatha Christie' after legal challenges from Rebekah Vardy and representatives of Agatha Christie's estate. Ford McMillan's plan to use the reversed name on personalized T-shirts was met with opposition from Vardy, who aims to use the term for her own products, and Agatha Christie Ltd, which asserts ownership of the name and trademarks. Luxury linen firm Christy also objected to the application.
Read more »
Thatchers Cider Triumphs in Trademark Battle Against AldiSomerset-based cider maker Thatchers successfully appeals a High Court ruling, securing a victory against supermarket chain Aldi in a trademark dispute.
Read more »
Thatchers win appeal against Aldi over cloudy lemon cider trademark battleSomerset-based Thatchers first sued Aldi for trademark infringement in November 2023, claiming its Taurus brand of cider copied its product.
Read more »