Supreme Court casts doubt on obstruction charges against hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters

United Kingdom News News

Supreme Court casts doubt on obstruction charges against hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters
United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines
  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 82%

Supreme Court conservatives questioned whether the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act can be used to prosecute those who attacked the U.S. Capitol

The Supreme Court cast doubt Tuesday on the legality of obstruction charges lodged against some 300 rioters arrested for breaking into the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The court's conservatives questioned whether the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was aimed at corporate accounting fraud, can be used more broadly to prosecute those who obstruct 'any official proceeding,' including Congress' 2021 certification of President Biden's election victory. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

One of those was Joseph Fischer, an off-duty Pennsylvania police officer, who said on social media he expected the attack on the Capitol 'might get violent' but that it was needed 'to send a message that we the people hold the real power.' When Fischer was arrested, he was charged with six counts of assault and disruption as well as seventh charge of obstruction, a charge which could send him to prison for several years. A federal judge rejected the obstruction charge, but the U.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

latimes /  🏆 11. in US

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Jan. 6 Defendants Warned Supreme Court Plea Could BackfireJan. 6 Defendants Warned Supreme Court Plea Could BackfireA U.S. attorney has issued a warning to Jan. 6 defendants hoping the Supreme Court will throw out a charge used in hundreds of cases.
Read more »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by New Mexico official ousted from office over Jan. 6Supreme Court rejects appeal by New Mexico official ousted from office over Jan. 6Couy Griffin will not be able to return to his seat as a county commissioner, which he was removed from under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment. Couy Griffin Supreme Court rejects appeal by New Mexico official ousted from office over Jan.
Read more »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionSupreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a former New Mexico county commissioner banished from public office for participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection
Read more »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by ex-county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionSupreme Court rejects appeal by ex-county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionNew Mexico's former Otero County commissioner Couy Griffin is the only elected official thus far to be banned from office in connection with the Capitol attack.
Read more »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionSupreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a former New Mexico county commissioner banished from public office for participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection.
Read more »

Supreme Court Refuses to Help Jan. 6 DefendantSupreme Court Refuses to Help Jan. 6 DefendantA January 6 defendant was hoping the Supreme Court would clear the way for him to hold office again.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-04-08 02:41:29