What ‘Civil War’ Gets Right (and Wrong) About Photojournalism

United Kingdom News News

What ‘Civil War’ Gets Right (and Wrong) About Photojournalism
United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom Headlines
  • 📰 petapixel
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 51%

Alex Garland's film 'Civil War' offers an unflinching look at combat at the photojournalists covering it, but it has some missteps.

eschews the typical trappings of a combat action movie by turning the lens not toward the soldiers but to the photographers capturing them. And while it excels in some aspects of its portrayal, it falters when it comes to the big stuff.“Rarely have I seen a movie that made me so acutely uncomfortable or watched an actor’s face that, like Dunst’s, expressed a nation’s soul-sickness so vividly that it felt like an X-ray,” a review fromis gripping and beautifully shot.

Safe practices specifically seem to elude the characters. Much of this falls on cub reporter Jessie, played by Cailee Spaeny. Her inexperience leads her to frequent missteps that endanger her or others. And while it’s somewhat understandable that she’s still learning the ropes, Jessie knows enough about photography to go on about lauded photojournalist Lee Miller, making it less reasonable that she would fail to understand basic safety protocols.

“The audience is clearly meant to see this as a heroic act, even though it is the one time a journalist breaks the ethics of neutrality,” Drake adds. Later, when one of the group members dies, we see Lee take the photograph but later delete it when looking back.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

petapixel /  🏆 527. in US

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Civil War 2024: A Haunting Portrayal of the Dangers of Civil WarCivil War 2024: A Haunting Portrayal of the Dangers of Civil WarThis film explores the dangers and atrocities of civil war, using the setting of the United States to create a sense of proximity and unease. It does not depict a second American civil war, but rather serves as a warning of what could happen if we are not vigilant.
Read more »

Why Is Civil War So Evasive About the Nature of Its Civil War?Why Is Civil War So Evasive About the Nature of Its Civil War?Alex Garland’s studious “objectivity” isn’t enough.
Read more »

What 'Civil War' gets right and wrong about photojournalism, according to a Pulitzer Prize winnerWhat 'Civil War' gets right and wrong about photojournalism, according to a Pulitzer Prize winnerCarolyn Cole, a veteran L.A. Times photographer who won a Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of civil war in Liberia, breaks down the depiction of her profession in A24's 'Civil War.'
Read more »

Civil War's Sniper Scene Explained & What It Reveals About The WarCivil War's Sniper Scene Explained & What It Reveals About The WarA sniper takes a shot in Civil War
Read more »

'Civil War' is a hackneyed portrait of war correspondents in the thick of it'Civil War' is a hackneyed portrait of war correspondents in the thick of itDirected by Alex Garland, the film is about an ideological conflict in which ideologies are never discussed. 'The movie manages to be exploitative while lacking the nerve of an exploitation picture,' reviews critic Sean Burns.
Read more »

‘Civil War’ review: Divided we stand, barely, with Kirsten Dunst as a war-torn photographer‘Civil War’ review: Divided we stand, barely, with Kirsten Dunst as a war-torn photographerThe movie is set in a divided United States an election or two into the future. It’s flawed and blunt but also coldly compelling.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-04-17 23:56:55