The controversial Ulez expansion raked in £26 million during its first month, after nearly halving the number of non-compliant vehicles driving in Greater London, according to estimates.
The number of polluting vehicles in London has dropped by 45 per cent since the launch of Sadiq Khan’s Ulez expansion, TfL has found. About 77,000 fewer non-compliant cars and vans were driving on the roads in September, dropping from 170,000 to 93,000. This means on average 95.2 per cent of vehicles now comply with the emission rules, the report suggests. The compliance rate for outer London is now almost on par with the rate in inner London, where 96.
”TfL’s next target is for 91 per cent of vans to comply with the emission rules by the end of the year, as the number for vans currently sits at 86.1 per cent. The report did not reveal, however, how much revenue had been generated by Ulez fines and penalties.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Fake Hertfordshire Ulez signs that QR link to Wombles tune removedThe council is reminding drivers that Ulez signs are not permitted in the county.
Read more »
Around 60,000 vehicles in London hit by daily Ulez feeTransport for London has published a report on the impact of expanding the scheme.
Read more »
Around 60,000 vehicles in London hit by daily Ulez feeTransport for London has published a report on the impact of expanding the scheme.
Read more »
Fake ULEZ signs play Wombles music, or pornDrivers scanning the signs have not been directed to sites where they can pay ULEZ fees
Read more »
Sadiq Khan hails report into ULEZ expansion despite thousands facing daily finesA new report has revealed how motorists have adapted to the expanded Ultra Low Emission Zone one month after it was introduced.
Read more »
Ulez: Vehicle compliancy rate at 95% across London, City Hall report saysLondon's mayor says the data shows the scheme is working, but the Conservatives call it a 'tax grab'.
Read more »